Tuesday, March 11, 2008

 

Daily Dude I Want to Hit: my soon-to-be lawyer


RAZZY Note: None of these are my lawyers, but they are good examples of the kind of shark I'm going to retain. In the undisclosed matter for which I need a lawyer, I think that either Ben Matlock, Executive Assistant District Attorney Jack McCoy, Atticus Finch, Silver Fox William Jefferson Clinton, or Matt Durning from "Beverly Hills, 90210" seasons 8-10 would be acceptable counsel.

Name: TBD

DOB: TBD

Occupation: barristry, awesomeness

Hometown: TBD

Current residence: New York, New York

Why I Want to Hit that Hotness: It's only Tuesday, but it's already been a brisk week here in the RAZZY.org legal department (and by "legal department" I mean my friend HotLawyer). I'm not going to really talk about what's going on right now, except to say that I'm not surprised that an abusive, misogynistic bastard has turned to the legal system as a means of further harassing me. I thus intend to lawyer up myself and let the professionals handle it. So does anyone know a good attorney on the fair isle of Mannahattas who knows a lot about defamation law? Holler at your girl.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Comments:
Go get 'em Razzy!
 
Razzy,
This may be unimaginative, but whatever. Have you tried lawyers.com?

http://www.lawyers.com/find_a_lawyer/advanced_search/index.php

Areas of practice include "Libel, Slander and Defamation" and "Internet Law". Unfortunately, no "Free Fucking Speech".

Good luck.
 
Shocker. You publicly disparaged the guy to the point of liable and he sued. People tried to warn you, but you chose to heed the advice of comment mouthbreathers who doled out legal gold like, "Fuck that asshole!" or, "You rule Razzy!". I'm sure the vast wealth of the Razzy empire will net you Manhattan's top legal eagle (read: free advice from friend).

Welcome to the world of tort law. In a country where even shockingly good attorneys will take a case on contingent, its much cheaper to be the plaintiff than the defendant. You are so fucked.

Why no details? Where's that cock-sure attitude now?
 
Well, Ryan, I would respond, but I'm pretty sure my lawyers would advise me not to since they're going to handle the fighting on this one for me.

But I wouldn't start making room for $7500 under your mattress yet, because you'd be surprised how many "shockingly good" lawyers will take a case pro bono when an abusive prick like yourself is using the legal system to further a well-documented campaign of harassment, especially when said abusive prick has no case whatsoever.

P.S. Before you accuse me of "liable," you might want to ask your hotshot attorney what the difference between that and "libel" actually is.
 
Burn on the libel vs. liable!

I don't know what's funnier: that you're getting sued (as you should), or that your ego is so ridiculously oversized that you are incapable of entertaining the possibility that someone other than the guy you're getting sued by would actual disagree with you.
But do continue - this train wreck will be fun to watch.
 
Oh, my bad, Ryan's friend who seems to know an awful lot of undisclosed information about this case. Please pass along a hearty "fuck you" to Ryan for me.
 
Why delete the last comment? Did it hit a little too close to home? Lame.

Your whole persona is a facade.
 
What comment? Whatever.
 
Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]